Here is one of the original motivations for Fisher’s inequality (Theorem 8.12) and sometimes known as Fisher’s inequality too.
For a -design with blocks and we have .
In case of , we have and so the inequality fails.
Let be the blocks. Consider the sets . are -sets of . Furthermore is of cardinality exactly for . Since , by the replication number identity and so for . Thus ’s are distinct and so by Fisher’s inequality, . ∎
Here is a matrix-theoretic proof of the proposition. For a design introduce the -incidence matrix by . Observe that has entries on diagonal and elsewhere. So .
Since , again . has one eigenvalue and the rest . So has eigenvalues and one eigenvalues by replication number identity again. Thus and so has rank . Thus the column rank of is also and so ∎
In the above proof, it is easy to see the following: If and is even, then is square matrix and . So
and hence is a square.