9.2 Fisher’s inequality for designs

Here is one of the original motivations for Fisher’s inequality (Theorem 8.12) and sometimes known as Fisher’s inequality too.

Proposition 9.9.

For a (v,k,λ)-design with b blocks and v>k we have bv.

In case of k=v, we have b=1 and so the inequality fails.

Proof.

Let B1,,Bb be the blocks. Consider the sets Sp={i:pBi}. Sp are r-sets of [b]. Furthermore SpSq is of cardinality exactly λ for pq. Since v>k, r>λ by the replication number identity and so SpSq for pq. Thus Sp’s are distinct and so by Fisher’s inequality, vb. ∎

Proof.

Here is a matrix-theoretic proof of the proposition. For a design introduce the v×b-incidence matrix N by N(p,B)=𝟏[pB]. Observe that NNT has entries r on diagonal and λ elsewhere. So NNT=(rλ)I+λJ.

Since v>k, again r>λ. J has one eigenvalue v and the rest 0. So NNT has v1 eigenvalues rλ and one eigenvalues (rλ)+λv=rk by replication number identity again. Thus det(NNT)=(rλ)v1rk0 and so N has rank v. Thus the column rank of N is also v and so bv

In the above proof, it is easy to see the following: If b=v and v is even, then N is square matrix and r=k. So

det(N)2=det(NNT)=(kλ)v1k2,

and hence kλ is a square.