A common example of poset is the power-set (subsets of a set ) ordered by inclusion. We now prove some results about this poset in the spirit of Dilworth’s theorem and Mirsky’s lemma. We can also say more about the decomposition of the chains. A chain here is sets such that . Let . The chain is symmetric (i.e., about ) if and for all . Symmetric chains are maximal if . Maximal chains can be given a bijection with permutations. Given a permutation , we have a maximal chain and vice-versa. On the other hand sets of cardinality form an anti-chain. The cardinality of the anti-chain is . The maximal cardinality anti-chain among these is the middle-level one i.e., sets of cardinality . This anti-chain has cardinality and as will see indicates a lot about the structure of the power-set. We now prove that the middle-level anti-chain is the largest possible.
If forms an anti-chain in then .
(Lubell, 1966) By the bijection with permutations, there are maximal chains. Refining the same argument, given a -set , there are maximal chains that contain . We will now prove the result via a double-counting argument.
Count the ordered pairs such that for some and is a maximal chain with . Since each maximal chain contains at most one element of an antichain, the number of pairs is at most the number of maximal chains which is . Let be the number of sets with cardinality . Since each -set is in maximal chains, the number of pairs is Thus we have that
or equivalently,
. Since is maximized for and , we have that
∎
Lubell used his proof to derive a general theorem which was also discovered independently by Meshalkin (1963) and Yamamoto (1954).
If is an anti-chain, then
More can be said about the partition into chains.
can be partitioned into mutually disjoint symmetric chains
Let be the poset. Consider the middle level sets in i.e., sets of cardinality . Since these form an anti-chain, there must be at least chains partitioning . We will now show existence of one such chain.
The proof of existence if by induction. Suppose is a symmetric partition of then we shall produce a symmetric partition of into sets. Since , we can check that for even,
and hence the proof is complete for even. Proof for odd to be completed.
Suppose is then define
and
It is easy to check that and preserve the symmetry of ’s but now w.r.t . Suppose . If , then belongs to at most one . Suppose . If is a maximal element in a chain of , then alone and if not alone. Thus form a partition of into symmetric chains. ∎