We say that a graph is -vertex (resp. -edge) connected if and is connected for any (resp. and ) with . Define (resp. ) is the largest such that is -vertex (resp. -edge) connected. We assume that is disconnected and so is -vertex or -edge connected iff . More easily, is -vertex or -edge connected iff is connected. Also, by the above convention .
Compute for the well-known graphs such as complete graph, path graph, cycle graph, trees, Cayley graph, petersen graph et al.
Let . Then .
Removing edges on the vertex with minimum degree proves the first inequality. By definition where . Let be the smallest edge-cut i.e., (see Exercise 7.19 as to why the smallest edge-cut will be of this form). Assume that i.e., is connected. We will show that .
If (i.e., every vertex in is adjacent to every vertex in ), then .
Else choose such that . Define . Every path has to pass through a vertex in . In other words, there is no path in . Thus, we have that . Now we complete the proof by showing that . For this observe, it suffices to observe that
and the LHS has cardinality at least . In other words, we have selected all the edges from to and for all other , we have selected one edge each to get at least edges. ∎