7.2 Vertex and edge connectivity

We say that a graph is k-vertex (resp. k-edge) connected if |V|>k and GS is connected for any SV (resp. |V|>1 and SE) with |S|<k. Define κ(G) (resp. λ(G)) is the largest k such that G is k-vertex (resp. k-edge) connected. We assume that G= is disconnected and so G is 0-vertex or 0-edge connected iff G. More easily, G is 1-vertex or 1-edge connected iff G is connected. Also, by the above convention λ(K1)=κ(K1)=0.

Exercise 7.16.

Compute λ(G),κ(G) for the well-known graphs such as complete graph, path graph, cycle graph, trees, Cayley graph, petersen graph et al.

Theorem 7.17 (Whitney (1932a)).

Let G. Then κ(G)λ(G)δ(G).

Proof.

Removing edges on the vertex with minimum degree proves the first inequality. By definition κ(G)n1 where n=|V|. Let [S,Sc]:=E(S×Sc) be the smallest edge-cut i.e., λ(G)=|[S,Sc]| (see Exercise 7.19 as to why the smallest edge-cut will be of this form). Assume that S,Sc i.e., G is connected. We will show that κ(G)|[S,Sc]|.

If E(S×Sc)=(S×Sc) (i.e., every vertex in S is adjacent to every vertex in Sc), then |[S,Sc]|=|S||Sc|=|S|(n|S|)n1κ(G).

Else choose xS,yS such that xy. Define T:={zSc:zx}{zS{x}:N(z)Sc}. Every xy path has to pass through a vertex in T. In other words, there is no xy path in GT. Thus, we have that κ(G)|T|. Now we complete the proof by showing that |T|[S,Sc]. For this observe, it suffices to observe that

{(x,z):zN(x)Sc}{(z,z):zS{x},N(z)Sc}E(S×Sc),

and the LHS has cardinality at least |T|. In other words, we have selected all the edges from x to Sc and for all other zS{x}, we have selected one edge each to get at least |T| edges. ∎